Emaar Malls Group

 

EVIDENCE A

10 – 8.5

B

8.4 – 7.5

C

7.4 – 6.5

D

6.4 – 6.0

F

< 60

Mark Awarded
Introduction and Methodology – Description of the research question and how the research was completed – including the reasons for choices. Includes:  
Identification and explanation of primary and secondary data collection methods

10%

 

A fully detailed description of all areas including primary and secondary methods with full reasons for the choices A clear description of most areas including primary and secondary methods with full reasons for the choices A very basic explanation of some areas of the data collection tools and some simple reasons for the choice The description of how the research was completed is vague and the reasons are not really clear. Only one or two of the key areas included No real description of how the research was completed with no reasons for the choice.

Key areas not really addressed.

 
Identification and explanation of quantitative and qualitative data collection tools including sample size and sampling method

10%

 

A fully detailed description of all areas showing the choices of data collection tools and sampling including reasons for the choices A clear description of most areas showing the choices of data collection tools and sampling including reasons for the choices A very basic explanation of some areas showing choices with some reasons for the choice The description of how the research was completed is vague and the reasons are not really clear. Only one or two of the key areas included No real description of how the research was completed with no reasons for the choice.

Key areas not really addressed.

 
Explanation of how the research activities related to the original decisions mentioned in the Proposal and Plan

 

10%

A fully detailed description of all areas showing how the research activities related to the original decisions from the Proposal and Plan A clear description of most areas showing how the research activities related to the original decisions from the Proposal and Plan A very basic explanation of some areas showing how the research relates to the original proposal The description of how the research was completed is vague and the reasons are not really clear. Only one or two of the key areas included No real description of how the research was completed with no reasons for the choice.

Key areas not really addressed.

 

 

 

 

Collation, Presentation and Analysis of Primary Data Collected  
Collation and presentation of Data

10%

 

Primary data collected has been professionally collated /summarised using an easy to read, attractive and consistent format. The data has been very professionally presented in a consistent and attractive way using recognised format(s). Primary data collected has been collated /summarised into an easy to read and consistent format. The data has been presented in a consistent and attractive way using recognised format(s).

 

Some attempt has been made to collate/ summarise the primary data collected in a recognised format. Some attempt has been made to present the data using recognised format(s).

 

Very little attempt has been made to collate/ summarise the primary data collected. Some of the data has been presented but in a very simple way.

 

No attempt has been made to collate/ summarise the primary data collected. Very little of the data has been presented and it is very untidy and inconsistent.

 

 
Descriptive Analysis of Data

10%

 

A fully descriptive explanation of the chosen data analysis method provided. The explanation /analysis of each set of data presented is full and descriptive. At least two relevant advanced statistical tools have been used appropriately. A clear explanation of the chosen data analysis method provided.

The explanation/analysis of each set of data presented is clear. The use of one advanced statistical tool is accurate and relevant.

Some attempt has been made to explain the chosen data analysis method. There is a simple and mostly clear explanation/ analysis of each set of data presented. Some attempt has been made to use an advanced statistical tool.

 

Very little attempt has been made to explain the chosen data analysis method. The explanation / analysis of each set of data is very simple with not much detail. No advanced statistical tools used. There is almost no explanation of the chosen data analysis method.

There is almost no explanation/analysis of the data. No advanced statistical tools used.

 

 

 

Conclusion

Final summary regarding the success and appropriateness of the data collection methods, tools and the analysis in relation to the research question and the proposed integration of CLOs in the proposal.

10%

A fully descriptive explanation of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)

 

A clear explanation of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)

 

A simple description of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)

 

Very little attempt to explain why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)

 

There is almost no explanation of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)

 

 

 

 

APPENDICES to include:

Evidence of primary data collection includes interview questions, questionnaires, and survey questions with responses. Evidence of secondary research is provided in the References

10%

Fully detailed evidence of primary data collection. More than 10 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed had prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References. Most of the evidence of primary data collection is clear. Between 5 and 10 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed had prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References. Some evidence of primary data collection included. At least 5 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed did not received prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References. Incomplete evidence of primary data collection included. Less than 5 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed did not received prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References. Only one or two samples of primary data collection included. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed did not received prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References.  

 

 

 

 

STRUCTURE AND FORMAT

10%

 

 

Paper is professionally formatted using the HCT guidelines with all of the requirements met;

·         Font size 12

·         1.5 line spacing

·         Headings and sub-headings

·         Titles on all charts

·         References page

·         Appendices

Paper is professionally formatted using the HCT guidelines but one of the following is missing;

·         Font size 12

·         1.5 line spacing

·         Headings and sub-headings

·         Titles on all charts

·         References page

·         Appendices

Paper is not formatted using the HCT guidelines and two of the following are missing;

·         Font size 12

·         1.5 line spacing

·         Headings and sub-headings

·         Titles on all charts

·         References page

·         Appendices

Paper is not formatted using the HCT guidelines and three of the following are missing;

·         Font size 12

·         1.5 line spacing

·         Headings and sub-headings

·         Titles on all charts

·         References page

·         Appendices

Paper is not formatted using the HCT guidelines and more than three of the following are missing;

·         Font size 12

·         1.5 line spacing

·         Headings and sub-headings

·         Titles on all charts

·         References page

·         Appendices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ENGLISH LANGUAGE

10%

 

Uses formal writing, logical flow and appropriate vocabulary. Up to five minor typos. Well written, flows logically with between 9 and 5 spelling or grammar omissions. Well written, flows logically with not more than 10 spelling or grammar omissions Written to an acceptable level, is easy to follow but more than 10 spelling and grammar omissions.

 

Many omissions that seriously affect the flow.  
APA STYLE REFERENCING AND SAFE ASSIGN

10%

 

 

Fully accurate APA formatting used including in-text citations. Safe Assign not more than 10%

 

Mostly accurate APA formatting used including in-text citations. Safe Assign not more than 15% APA formatting used including in-text citations with occasional omissions or omissions. Safe Assign not more than 20% Some attempt made to use APA formatting including in-text citations although omissions are often evident. Safe Assign is more than 25%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APA formatting not used and no in-text citations.

Paper not checked using Safe Assign.

 

 
 

Student Name/ID/Section                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Total Final Grade                                  %

 

 

Assessor:                                                                                               Date:

 

Feedback Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Positi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EVIDENCE A

10 – 8.5

B

8.4 – 7.5

C

7.4 – 6.5

D

6.4 – 6.0

F

< 60

Mark Awarded
Introduction and Methodology – Description of the research question and how the research was completed – including the reasons for choices. Includes:  
Identification and explanation of primary and secondary data collection methods

10%

 

A fully detailed description of all areas including primary and secondary methods with full reasons for the choices A clear description of most areas including primary and secondary methods with full reasons for the choices A very basic explanation of some areas of the data collection tools and some simple reasons for the choice The description of how the research was completed is vague and the reasons are not really clear. Only one or two of the key areas included No real description of how the research was completed with no reasons for the choice.

Key areas not really addressed.

 
Identification and explanation of quantitative and qualitative data collection tools including sample size and sampling method

10%

 

A fully detailed description of all areas showing the choices of data collection tools and sampling including reasons for the choices A clear description of most areas showing the choices of data collection tools and sampling including reasons for the choices A very basic explanation of some areas showing choices with some reasons for the choice The description of how the research was completed is vague and the reasons are not really clear. Only one or two of the key areas included No real description of how the research was completed with no reasons for the choice.

Key areas not really addressed.

 
Explanation of how the research activities related to the original decisions mentioned in the Proposal and Plan

 

10%

A fully detailed description of all areas showing how the research activities related to the original decisions from the Proposal and Plan A clear description of most areas showing how the research activities related to the original decisions from the Proposal and Plan A very basic explanation of some areas showing how the research relates to the original proposal The description of how the research was completed is vague and the reasons are not really clear. Only one or two of the key areas included No real description of how the research was completed with no reasons for the choice.

Key areas not really addressed.

 

 

 

 

Collation, Presentation and Analysis of Primary Data Collected  
Collation and presentation of Data

10%

 

Primary data collected has been professionally collated /summarised using an easy to read, attractive and consistent format. The data has been very professionally presented in a consistent and attractive way using recognised format(s). Primary data collected has been collated /summarised into an easy to read and consistent format. The data has been presented in a consistent and attractive way using recognised format(s).

 

Some attempt has been made to collate/ summarise the primary data collected in a recognised format. Some attempt has been made to present the data using recognised format(s).

 

Very little attempt has been made to collate/ summarise the primary data collected. Some of the data has been presented but in a very simple way.

 

No attempt has been made to collate/ summarise the primary data collected. Very little of the data has been presented and it is very untidy and inconsistent.

 

 
Descriptive Analysis of Data

10%

 

A fully descriptive explanation of the chosen data analysis method provided. The explanation /analysis of each set of data presented is full and descriptive. At least two relevant advanced statistical tools have been used appropriately. A clear explanation of the chosen data analysis method provided.

The explanation/analysis of each set of data presented is clear. The use of one advanced statistical tool is accurate and relevant.

Some attempt has been made to explain the chosen data analysis method. There is a simple and mostly clear explanation/ analysis of each set of data presented. Some attempt has been made to use an advanced statistical tool.

 

Very little attempt has been made to explain the chosen data analysis method. The explanation / analysis of each set of data is very simple with not much detail. No advanced statistical tools used. There is almost no explanation of the chosen data analysis method.

There is almost no explanation/analysis of the data. No advanced statistical tools used.

 

 

 

Conclusion

Final summary regarding the success and appropriateness of the data collection methods, tools and the analysis in relation to the research question and the proposed integration of CLOs in the proposal.

10%

A fully descriptive explanation of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)

 

A clear explanation of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)

 

A simple description of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)

 

Very little attempt to explain why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)

 

There is almost no explanation of why these chosen data collection methods and data analysis tools have been used to support the coverage of the CLOs and research question(s)

 

 

 

 

APPENDICES to include:

Evidence of primary data collection includes interview questions, questionnaires, and survey questions with responses. Evidence of secondary research is provided in the References

10%

Fully detailed evidence of primary data collection. More than 10 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed had prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References. Most of the evidence of primary data collection is clear. Between 5 and 10 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed had prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References. Some evidence of primary data collection included. At least 5 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed did not received prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References. Incomplete evidence of primary data collection included. Less than 5 interviews conducted. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed did not received prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References. Only one or two samples of primary data collection included. The number of questionnaires and surveys completed did not received prior approval. Evidence of secondary research is shown in the References.  

 

 

 

 

STRUCTURE AND FORMAT

10%

 

 

Paper is professionally formatted using the HCT guidelines with all of the requirements met;

·         Font size 12

·         1.5 line spacing

·         Headings and sub-headings

·         Titles on all charts

·         References page

·         Appendices

Paper is professionally formatted using the HCT guidelines but one of the following is missing;

·         Font size 12

·         1.5 line spacing

·         Headings and sub-headings

·         Titles on all charts

·         References page

·         Appendices

Paper is not formatted using the HCT guidelines and two of the following are missing;

·         Font size 12

·         1.5 line spacing

·         Headings and sub-headings

·         Titles on all charts

·         References page

·         Appendices

Paper is not formatted using the HCT guidelines and three of the following are missing;

·         Font size 12

·         1.5 line spacing

·         Headings and sub-headings

·         Titles on all charts

·         References page

·         Appendices

Paper is not formatted using the HCT guidelines and more than three of the following are missing;

·         Font size 12

·         1.5 line spacing

·         Headings and sub-headings

·         Titles on all charts

·         References page

·         Appendices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ENGLISH LANGUAGE

10%

 

Uses formal writing, logical flow and appropriate vocabulary. Up to five minor typos. Well written, flows logically with between 9 and 5 spelling or grammar omissions. Well written, flows logically with not more than 10 spelling or grammar omissions Written to an acceptable level, is easy to follow but more than 10 spelling and grammar omissions.

 

Many omissions that seriously affect the flow.  
APA STYLE REFERENCING AND SAFE ASSIGN

10%

 

 

Fully accurate APA formatting used including in-text citations. Safe Assign not more than 10%

 

Mostly accurate APA formatting used including in-text citations. Safe Assign not more than 15% APA formatting used including in-text citations with occasional omissions or omissions. Safe Assign not more than 20% Some attempt made to use APA formatting including in-text citations although omissions are often evident. Safe Assign is more than 25%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APA formatting not used and no in-text citations.

Paper not checked using Safe Assign.

 

 
(p9)

Place your order now to enjoy great discounts on this or a similar topic.

People choose us because we provide:

Essays written from scratch, 100% original,

Delivery within deadlines,

Competitive prices and excellent quality,

24/7 customer support,

Priority on their privacy,

Unlimited free revisions upon request, and

Plagiarism free work,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Similar Assignment Now!

  • Our Support Staff are online 24/7
  • Our Writers are available 24/7
  • Most Urgent order is delivered within 4 Hrs
  • 100% Original Assignment Plagiarism report can be sent to you upon request.

GET 15 % DISCOUNT TODAY use the discount code PAPER15 at the order form.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: